Rob Ford should show some Respect For Taxpayers

So you’re upset about your taxes going up, and the wasteful spending at City Hall, and you want the next mayor of Canada’s largest city to do something about it? Well then Rob Ford’s your man!

Recently, the Ford campaign published RespectForTaxpayers.com, a list of City Hall programs that were approved or expanded over the most recent term of City Council, which Ford claims are wasting taxpayers’ hard-earned dollars on frivolous and unnecessary spending. Ford vows that when he is mayor, all of these programs will come to an end, saving taxpayers money.

So far, the cumulative total of the wasteful spending Ford claims on his website stands at $215,678,400. As detailed by Simon McNeil in his blog post dissecting Ford’s claims, his claims are dubious at best, and in many cases outright ridiculous. Even so, for the purpose of this post, I’ll use Ford’s numbers.

The budget contained in Toronto’s 2008 financial statements (the most recent I can find on the City website) calls for expenditures of $10.2 billion. If Ford is able to cut 100% of his identified “waste” so far, he will have reduced expenditures by a whopping 2.1%.

However, Ford has also vowed to put an end to the Personal Vehicle Tax and Land Transfer Tax, which despite coming up short of expectations, generated $201 million for the City in 2009, according to this Toronto Star article. That brings Ford’s savings down to under $15 million, roughly 0.144% of the 2008 budget.

Based on 2008 property tax rates, tax on the average $395,460 home (source) comes in at $3,459.97 (rounding to the nearest cent). If 100% of Ford’s savings went into reducing property taxes, the tax savings on the average home would be $4.98. Four dollars and ninety-eight cents. Of course, city finances do NOT work that way, but once again we’ll go with it for now.

According to his Waste Watch, here’s how Rob Ford plans to save you the price of a mediocre latte once a year:

  • Chain councillors to restrictive spending policies, so that they cannot freely address the concerns and interests of their constituents. Kyle Rae, councillor for Ward 27, is attending an AIDS Conference in Austria – Ford calls this a waste of time and money.
  • Remove indoor plants from City Hall. Ford thinks watering them is wasteful.
  • Send your tax dollars to China by outsourcing the design, construction, and maintenance of our new subway vehicles, versus building them in northern Ontario. Ford thinks keeping jobs in Canada and cash in our economy is a waste.
  • End two successful and inexpensive treatment programs for Toronto’s homeless. Rather than “waste” $76,000 annually, Ford would toss them into the street to fend for themselves.
  • Throw caution to the wind, literally, rather than fund a study on the effect of changing weather patterns to Toronto, to design better infrastructure and be better prepared for storms and other events.
  • Halt the progress of the City’s expanding bike lane network. Well, it should come as no surprise that the Etobicoke councillor thinks that making our streets safe for everybody is a waste of money.
  • Cut up the City’s credit cards, because an audit found “some abuses” in a staff purchasing program. Only the wealthy should work at City Hall, right Mr. Ford?

All for four dollars and ninety-eight cents.

Please, Toronto, vote for someone with an actual vision for the city, not just someone who is very, very angry. Vote for someone who will make the city a better place for everyone.

Please read Simon McNeil’s Profiles in Profanity, and please read All Fired Up In The Big Smoke. Educate yourself.

This entry was posted in Politics, Toronto and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Victoria

    Well written article but problem is the non-downtown folk don’t follow Twitter and blogs like this. Ford being very, very angry is unfortunately working north of Bloor. We can only hope that people come to their senses come sep or oct and realize this man is a disaster for us. Also Hume wrote a nice article on Ford. You probably saw but he also nailed the whole angry vote thingy.

  • http://www.stateofthecity.ca Brian

    I was going to do a similar analysis with a visualization, but stopped when I got dragged into another project.

    But my own angle had an important distinction – city budgets are organized differently into capital and operating budgets – a distinction McNeil’s review doesn’t seem to handle well. Getting rid of any “one-time” capital expense has a much lower impact on the operating budget (because the capital expense is amortized). And cutting one-time operating expenses aren’t necessarily a permanent reduction either.

    In other words, from the standpoint of impact on annual tax bills, the numbers are almost certainly far LOWER than you suggest.

    • http://www.gregburrell.ca Greg Burrell

      Thanks for your comment, Brian. You’re right, and that’s what I meant by “city finances do NOT work that way”. I was purposely oversimplifying the math to point out that even the meagre savings of $4.98 per taxpayer is a pipe dream. Although the City’s 2008 operating budget [source] is $8.171 billion, revenues from property taxes account for only $3.315 billion. If you factor in that ratio, the per-taxpayer savings drop to $2.02.

      I encourage you to go ahead with your own visualization. The more we expose Ford’s lies and incompetence, the better for Toronto.

  • http://October25.ca HiMY SYeD

    Victoria,

    Almost Every one on one conversation I am enjoying with a Rob Ford decided voter North of Bloor and beyond, switches to me.

    While canvassing, Someone called me ‘The Thinking Man’s Rob Ford’.

    These are centre-LEFT people who ‘were’ voting for My Opponent, but no longer.

    HiMY SYeD

  • Chris H

    Great article!
    I like when people use facts and have hard dollar values or thier arguments.
    The fact that no politician is willing to place a dollar value (per person) for project/program costs or savings always frustrates me.

    C

  • Caullyn

    Great information! It seems to add up, unfortunately we have some very slim pickings for mayor in this election. I can’t imagine putting Smitherman, Pantalone, Ford, Rossi into office, Thomson is the only one left not to offend me!

    Cheers

  • http://wqebelle.blogspot.com William Belle

    Now that the election is over and we have handed the keys to car to Mr. Ford, I am wandering around worried that what Ford does is not going to match what he has sometimes irrationally and unmathematically said he would do. Are we now all in trouble?

    Great article. I like the fact checking.

    • Cordly

      Ford and his ( stop the gravy train ) slogan, seems to have been enough to propel him in to the Mayors seat for 4 years.
      Ford does not explain how much will actually be saved , but I figure marginal, at best.
      He does not know , he used that dog & pony show to get elected.
      Look for plenty of cuts to services and just about anything they can sell off .

      But who is really the driving force here , brother Doug and that mutt Holyday.
      They keep him away from the media because they know he is crude and a hot head and would out his foot in his mouth , witch he has already done many times.
      Apparently more people have been hired to seek out all this elusive gravy.

  • Cordly

    Ford and his ( stop the gravy train ) slogan, seems to have been enough to propel him in to the Mayors seat for 4 years.
    Ford does not explain how much will actually be saved , but I figure marginal, at best.
    He does not know , he used that dog & pony show to get elected.
    Look for plenty of cuts to services and just about anything they can sell off .

    But who is really the driving force here , brother Doug and that mutt Holyday.
    They keep him away from the media because they know he is crude and a hot head and would out his foot in his mouth , witch he has already done many times.
    Apparently more people have been hired to seek out all this elusive gravy.